Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2410 14
Original file (NR2410 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
701 5. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001
ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490

 

JSR
Docket No. NR2410-14
17 July 2014

From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records
To: Secretary of the Navy

 
 

REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD

Ref: (a) Titie 10 U.S.C. 1552

Encl: (1) DD Form 149 dtd 22 Nov 13 w/attachments
(2) HQOMC JAM memo dtd 9 May 1.4
(3) HQOMC MIQ memo dtd 12 Jun 14
(4) Subject's naval record

1. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), ‘Subject,
hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with
this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval
record be corrected by removing the service record page 11
(“Administrative Remarks (1070)") entry dated 23 February 2011

and his rebuttal of the same date, copies of which are at Tab A.

2. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Genteman, Iving and Sproul,
reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 1’
July 2014, and pursuant to its regulations, determined that the
corrective action indicated below should be taken on the
available evidence of record. Documentary material considered
by the Board consisted of the enclosures, naval records, and
applicable statutes, regulations and policies.

3, The Board, having reviewed all the facts of record
pertaining to Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice,
finds as follows:

a. Before applying to this Board, Petitioner exhausted ail
administrative remedies available under existing law and
regulations within the Department of the Navy.

b. In correspondence attached as enclosures (2) and (3),
the Headquarters Marine Corps offices with cognizance over the
subject matter of Petitioner’s case have commented to the effect
that the request has merit and warrants favorable action. ,

CONCLUSION:

Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record,
and especially in light of the contents of enclosures (2) and
(3), the Board finds the existence of an error warranting the
following corrective action:

RECOMMENDATION :

a. That Petitioner's naval record be corrected by removing
the service record page 11 (“Administrative Remarks (1070)")
entry dated 23 February 2011 and his rebuttal of the same date.
This igs to be accomplished by physically removing the page 11 on
which the entry appears and the rebuttal, or completely
obliterating the entry and rebuttal so they cannot be read,
rather than merely lining through them.

b. That any material or entries inconsistent with or
relating to the Board's recommendation be corrected, removed or
completely expunged from Petitioner's record and that no such
entries or material be added to the record in the future.

_¢. That any material directed to be removed from
Petitioner's naval record be returned to the Board, together
with a copy of this Report of Proceedings, for retention in a
confidential file maintained for such purpose, with no cross
reference being made a part of Petitioner's naval record.

4. Pursuant to Section 6(c) of the revised Procedures of the
Board for Correction of Naval Records (32 Code of Federal
Regulations, Section 723.6(c)) it is certified that a quorum was
present at the Board's review and deliberations, and that the
foregoing is a true and complete record of the Board's
proceedings in the above entitled matter.

Bove PA Co lege

ROBERT D. 4ZSALMAN JONATHAN S. RUSKIN
Recorder Acting Recorder

5. Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section
6(e) of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of
Naval Records (32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section 723.6(e))
and having assured compliance with its provisions, it is hereby
announced that the foregoing corrective action, taken under the
authority of reference (a}, has been approved by the Board on
behalf of the Secretary of the Navy.

TRS,

ROBERT D. Z2SALMAN
Acting Executive Director

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 06982 12

    Original file (06982 12.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed written application, enclosure (1), with this Board requesting, in effect, that his naval record be corrected by removing the fitness report for 2 March to 31 December 2007 (copy at Tab A) and the service record page 11(c) (“Administrative Remarks (1070)”) entry dated 28 June 2007 with his rebuttal dated 6 July 2007 (copies at Tab B). The Board, consisting of Ms. Zivnuska and Messrs. Mann...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 03744-10

    Original file (03744-10.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 ° ue : BUG Docket No: 3744-10 22 April 2010 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Sub] :

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 01766-10

    Original file (01766-10.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected by removing the service record page 11 (“Administrative Remarks (1070)") entry dated 29 May 2008, a copy of which is at Tab A. The Board, consisting of Messrs. George, Hess and Pfeiffer, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 12 April 2010, and pursuant to its regulations,...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 05641-08

    Original file (05641-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    No: 5641-08 5 December 2008 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: Leer) REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed written application, enclosure (1), with this Board requesting that his naval record be corrected by removing the service record page 11.d (*Administrative Remarks (1070)") entry dated 6 April 2006 and his rebuttal dated 13...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 10680-07

    Original file (10680-07.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed written application, enclosure (1), with this Board requesting that his naval record be corrected by removing the service record page il (“Administrative Remarks (1070)”) entry dated 20 July 2005 and, by implication, his rebuttal dated 27 July 2005. That Petitioner’s naval record be corrected by removing the service record page 11 (“Administrative Remarks (1070)”) entry dated 20 July 2005 and...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 02803-07

    Original file (02803-07.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    He further requested removal of the fitness report for 20 November 1998 to 31 March 1999 (copy at Tab C in enclosure (1)). d. In enclosure (3), Petitioner added his request to remove the page 11 entry dated 24 March 1999. e. In enclosure (4), the HQMC PERB commented to the effect that the contested fitness report should stand. That Petitioner’s naval record be corrected by removing the service record page 11d (“Administrative Remarks (1070) 7”) entry dated 24 March 1999.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR3743-13

    Original file (NR3743-13.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Finally, by implication, he also requested removing the page 11 entry dated 3 August 2011. The Board, consisting of Ms. Lapinski and Messrs. Gorenflo and Hicks, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 13 March 2014, and pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. That Petitioner's naval record be corrected by removing the service record page 11(b) (“Administrative Remarks...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR8518-13

    Original file (NR8518-13.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    2, The Board, consisting of Messrs. Boyd, Chapman and Spain, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 20 Maxch 2014, and pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. c. That any material or entries inconsistent with or relating to the Board's recommendation be corrected, removed or completely expunged from Petitioner's record and that no such entries or material be added to the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 05953 12

    Original file (05953 12.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected by removing the service record page 11 (“Administrative Remarks (1070)") entry dated 30 March 2006, a copy of which is at Tab A. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Gorenflo, Grover and Midboe, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 3 October 2012, and pursuant to its...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 03374-08

    Original file (03374-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    3374-08 17 July 2008 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: ¢ Secretary of the Navy REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD Ref: (a) 10 U.S.C. Subject, filed enclosure (1) with that the applicable naval e service record page 11 (a) entry dated 2 February 2008, a 2. That any material or entries inconsistent with or relating to the Board's recommendation be corrected, removed or completely expunged from Petitioner's record and that no such entries or material be added to the record in the future.